CLASSIFIEDSADVERTISINGSPECIAL ISSUESONLINE SPORTSOBITUARIESNORTHERN JOBSTENDERS

NNSL Photo/Graphic

NNSL Photo/Graphic
Editorial Cartoons

Subscriber pages
buttonspacer News Desk
buttonspacer Columnists
buttonspacer Editorial
buttonspacer Readers comment
buttonspacer Tenders

Demo pages
Here's a sample of what only subscribers see

Subscribe now
Subscribe to both hardcopy or internet editions of NNSL publications

Advertising
Our print and online advertising information, including contact detail.

Home page text size buttonsbigger textsmall textText size


New Day should see another day
Yellowknifer - Wednesday, November 16, 2016

When a regular MLA with personal experience, his colleagues and various community members descend upon legislative assembly to defend a program in threat of shutting down, cabinet is wise to take heed.

This is what happened Nov. 2 as MLAs debated a motion to extend A New Day, a pilot healing program for men who have acted violently toward loved ones. The program, run by Tree of Peace Friendship Centre with funding through the Department of Justice, has offered free counselling services since 2012. On Dec. 31, that funding is set to dry up while the Department of Justice carries out a review of the program. This means A New Day is set to end at the end of the year - at least temporarily.

Deh Cho MLA Michael Nadli went through the program himself after he was convicted of assault causing bodily harm last year. He was the one to table the motion and used the opportunity to describe how he has personally benefited from the program.

Mackenzie Delta MLA Frederick Blake Jr. and Hay River North MLA R. J. Simpson also used question period to ask Justice Minister Louis Sebert about A New Day's future - and this is where things got interesting.

Blake asked about how much money was available for the program. Sebert said he wasn't sure.

Sebert then denied A New Day services are offered twice a month for people awaiting court proceedings, prompting Simpson to retort the minister should "check his facts." MLAs even heckled Sebert at points over his ignorance about the program, shouting, "Wrong!" in response to what they believed to be inaccurate information.

There is no doubt Sebert is a busy man but considering he knew he would be answering questions about A New Day last Wednesday, why wouldn't he do his research so at least he'd be prepared for them?

There is plenty of evidence to support the notion A New Day is an effective, valuable program. And it's well known the NWT is the second worst jurisdiction in Canada when it comes to family violence. Logically, the GNWT should be doing anything it can to preserve programming that helps mitigate this problem.

It boggles the mind that the minister would consider sitting on his hands rather than work to keep A New Day going.


A good path to language revitalization
Yellowknifer - Wednesday, November 16, 2016

Indigenous languages are dying, we know this.

As older generations die, taking their language with them, young indigenous people are much more likely to learn English as a first language across the country. This has led to certain languages, such as Gwich'in, whittled down to just a couple hundred fluent speakers.

This is why it is so good to see Sir John Franklin High School add the Weledeh dialect to its language programming. Because it is a pilot program, Grade 9 students will be the only beneficiaries at first but the school hopes to expantd the classes to Grades 10, 11 and 12 as well.

Learning a second language is already a basic part of high-school curriculum so why shouldn't the Department of Education, Culture and Development, which recognizes 11 official languages, offer indigenous language programming for interested students from kindergarten to graduation?

The only way to keep languages alive is to pass it down generations, so it's encouraging to see Yellowknife Education District No. 1 step up to the plate.


Bullies, moral superiority paved the way for president-elect Trump
Editorial Comment by Darrell Greer
Kivalliq News - Wednesday, November 16, 2016

The reason the media, and those on the left, never saw Donald Trump's victory coming can be chalked up to their own morally-superior attitudes.

The voice that carried president-elect Trump to power is that of the lower middle class - working-class people who have been ignored for years and have become totally disillusioned with the system.

It was funny to see some quarters try to pass off Trump's victory on rich white people, using a baseline of $50,000 annual income.

Please!

Many of these families have Mom and Dad each working 40 hours a week and wondering, for the most part, why they're still living paycheque to paycheque.

And, all the while, many of them still have the threat of losing their home or, at least, taking out another 20-year mortgage should interest rates rise.

Why was Trump such a lightning rod for so many millions of people?

He gave them a voice.

For the past 15 years those on the left have been nothing short of bullies.

If you didn't agree with what they were saying, you were a bigot or a racist.

There were no constructive talks, point or counter-point discussions.

The only points made by the left were: they are morally superior, knew how the world should work and would play the race card against anyone opposed to their views.

Trump allowed the rest of the people to vote for change, without personally being labelled a racist, and they took advantage of it.

It's mind-numbing to see the left has learned nothing from what just happened.

Not supporting globalization doesn't make anyone a racist.

Globalization, at this particular point in time, is not being bought into around the world.

A few short weeks ago the left was screaming bloody blue murder over Trump's hesitancy to come right out and say he would accept the election results, win or lose.

Now it's trying to stage demonstrations against his upcoming presidency.

The left has had its way for far too long.

Pulling on the lion's tail was so easy under the guises of racism and privilege.

You didn't need arguments or facts, just labels, and the whole thing became the same type of joke the establishment viewed Trump to be.

Then, this past week, the lion turned and bared its claws and Trump became the president-elect.

Now, we have would-be leaders of the Tories right here in Canada publicly stating they like what happened in the States, and the same thing should happen here.

Could you imagine anyone stating they want to ensure immigrants embrace Canadian values without a Trump victory?

People want jobs that allow them to care properly for their families, affordable health care, and to know they haven't been forgotten by their own country.

The media and the left tirelessly promoted Trump as a monster, and now they have to deal with the monster they created.

But if they continue to spew self-righteous indignation, all of us on this side of the world are in for some troubled times ahead.


A past that shouldn't haunt you
Northwest Territories/News North - Monday, November 14, 2016

When an MLA demanded the justice minister order the RCMP to stop the "outrageous" practice of issuing enhanced criminal record checks, was she arguing in favour of placing vulnerable people at risk?

When Justice Minister Louis Sebert slammed the door in the Yellowknife Centre rep Julie Green's face, was he perpetuating the argument that the best predictor of future behavior is past-behavior - even if no charges were laid or convictions entered?

There are two clear schools of thought about enhanced criminal record checks - also called vulnerable sector checks - created by the federal government in 2000 to protect children and others coming into contact with people who might do them harm.

One is that, as MLA Green stated in the legislative assembly on Oct. 25, is that it is indeed "outrageous" to think that a person can be denied a job with vulnerable people or forbidden from volunteering with a non-profit group because of a "record of non-conviction" issued by police.

"What we are talking about here is providing records that say that there has been an interaction with the law but not a conviction," Green said in questioning Sebert. "I don't object to having criminal record checks for vulnerable sector individuals or for any others who require them."

The practice of providing profiles of police contact - also referred to as "negative" or "adverse" police contacts - comes when individuals are asked to supply an enhanced criminal record check.

Now the information is released to the individual, not the person hiring or volunteer chairperson but it is a mandatory requirement of some positions.

"You can't get or keep the job without the criminal record check and the criminal check is released along with the record of non-conviction, it's all on one page," Green stated. "The injustice of this situation is clear for any fair-minded person. The words 'innocent until proven guilty' come to mind but do they mean anything?"

This longstanding federal policy is one that simply can't be superseded through a rejigging of our policing contract with the RCMP, as Green asked of Sebert.

However, the reason for her questioning the justice minister in the first place is sound.

Just think about it a bit. Should a few interactions with the law - let's say a licence suspension after a roadside checkstop or a couple of police calls over the course of a messy divorce - disqualify you to be a Big Brother? Or to coach your child's soccer team?

The problem is, apart from it indeed being an outrageous intrusion into one's personal privacy, that many people in a position to hire who receive an enhanced criminal record check will be afraid to green-light a candidate unless the record is spotless.

In a 2015 study entitled, "False promises, hidden costs," the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) noted an increasing number of Canadian organizations are incorporating police record checks into their hiring and management practices.

The CCLA stated there is no evidence that broad use of criminal records materially reduces the risk of crime or violent offenses in the workplace.

"To the contrary, systemic barriers to employment undermine the significant efforts and resources put into reintegration and ultimately prejudices community safety," the report stated.

There are movements across the country to re-examine the use of non-conviction records.

For Minister Sebert to glibly brush off Green's inquiry showed either he is truly a hard-line law-and-order politician, or that he's simply afraid of doing any heavy lifting on the file.

We suggest MLA Green re-frame her question for the next session - perhaps better emphasizing the efforts that are being made nationally to change the applicable section of the Criminal Records Act.

She should call on the minister to not wait to see what happens elsewhere but to even step up and take a lead on the issue that is perhaps more important to constituents in the NWT than he realizes.


Don't hold your breath for pot store
Nunavut/News North - Monday, November 14, 2016

As Canada prepares to legalize marijuana, the discussion nationally and territorially turns to how the drug will get to consumers.

The Ontario government plans to allow people to walk into a liquor store or similar operation to purchase the drug over the counter.

Nunavut has yet to build such infrastructure for alcohol - despite overwhelming voter support for a beer and wine store in Iqaluit - so if you're waiting for a marijuana fix, don't hold your breath.

Depending on the community, Nunavummiut have varying access to alcohol. Residents decide - by ballot - whether their communities should be wet or dry.

Even in wet communities, a consumer has to order ahead of time to get their alcohol, save for visiting a bar or restaurant where alcohol is served.

The obvious benefits of allowing beer and wine stores is that they circumvent the bootleggers and place controls on the amount of booze being sold.

It only makes sense that the same approach should be taken with marijuana.

Unfortunately, the optics of selling marijuana will make it a much harder sell. To date, bootlegging has been preferred to a beer store, and likewise you can expect that legislators would rather continue the current situation, where users buy their drugs outside the local grocery store, than appear to support consumption.

Keith Peterson, the minister responsible for the Nunavut Liquor Commission, announced just last week that an Iqaluit beer and wine store will be coming at last next year but considering the foot-dragging that has been going on since the 2015 plebiscite that saw nearly 80 per cent support, it's clear the government is only obliging its results grudgingly.

One benefit of taking control of the sale of marijuana should not be ignored. In the US, Colorado was a leader in legalizing marijuana, and sales there were predicted to bring in $70 million in tax revenue after the first year. In fact, the figure was actually higher. CNN reports revenue of $106 million in the first year and $163 million in the second.

Colorado has about 145 times as many people as Nunavut, so let's start with an estimate of $1 million annually for Nunavut's coffers should the territory start selling the drug.

Substance abuse prevention programs and those enacted to reduce drunken and stoned driving are usually the beneficiaries of this funding, and Nunavummiut can all agree, especially during Addictions Awareness Week, that Nunavut could use another $1 million per year for these programs.

Alas, given the government's slow reaction to the beer and wine store plebiscite vote, should voters say they want it to sell marijuana, don't be surprised if the Nunavut government takes its time.

That said, alcohol is the drug of choice and the bigger problem.

Let's see some action on this file, and do whatever is needed to increase the funding available for home-grown treatment programs.

Even if that means opening 'beer, wine and marijuana' stores in the communities that want them.


Helping victims travel a good move for justice
Weekend Yellowknifer - Friday, November 11, 2016

The criminal justice system exists to ensure people accused of crimes get their day in court, and are punished with an appropriate sentence should they be found guilty.

This is often small consolation for victims of crime who must endure lengthy court proceedings while waiting for justice to be served. The situation is particularly egregious for people who have lost a family member to homicide and must pay their own way if they don't live in the same community where court is being held.

Fortunately, a new travel assistance program is being established to help families of homicide victims who want to attend court proceedings. Until now, witnesses called to court did get some financial help to attend but not family members who had no direct involvement in the court process.

The program is a new initiative by the Native Women's Association of the NWT who have long had a role in helping victims of crime and violence but no money to help cover costs for family members to attend court.

The group put forth a proposal to the NWT Victims Assistance Fund - a territorial government-administered program funded by surcharges paid by offenders sentenced in court - which led to the creation of the travel assistance program.

The program covers transportation costs for family members to travel to Yellowknife or wherever in the NWT a homicide case is being heard in court, up to five days of meals and hotel lodgings, and as many as six counselling sessions. It also includes a handbook, titled Homicide and Loss of a Loved One, to help family members navigate the court process. The counselling is there to help people deal with mental trauma and issues that may come up during the court process.

The handbook, compiled with the help of the Status of Women Council of the NWT, the RCMP, coroner's office and the NWT community justice department, helps guide people through the legal process while offering suggestions on how to help grieving family members cope.

This new partnership between government, police and victims services gives families a much-needed support system. Grieving the loss of a loved one is traumatic enough, made worse when a life has been ended through violence.

At least now, families can focus on mourning and healing and not worry about how they are going to afford making the trip to see justice being carried out.


Thirty recommendations miss the mark
Weekend Yellowknifer - Friday, November 11, 2016

A $110,000 consultant's report on the state of fire protection within the city came back with the primary recommendation that the city hire more firefighters.

Hiring more firefighters is well and good but the report missed the most glaring challenge our firefighters face when they are called out to battle a structure fire in many parts of the city.

Time and time again Yellowknife's finest arrive on the scene ready to battle fire and ensure public safety only to struggle with an unreliable water delivery system.

At least twice this year firefighters responded to fires -- one in Kam Lake and one in Old Town -- where water supply was interrupted as firefighters battled structure fires.

The fire department relies on tanker trucks and portable reservoirs where no fire hydrants are available, as in Kam Lake or Old Town.

While parts of the city are not well-suited to underground pipelines and surface hydrants, it seems ridiculous that Kam Lake, the city's industrial area, remains without piped water. It should be noted too that Latham Island is particularly vulnerable to fire where narrow streets make it difficult for fire trucks to pass.

This becomes all the more problematic when extra water tankers are required and the time it takes to fill the portable reservoirs.

This is a disaster waiting to happen.

Hiring more firefighters without first addressing the matter of water delivery has the appearance of hiring more cooks to stir the same number of pots.

The city may need more firefighters but it first needs to ensure firefighters have a consistent supply of water at every fire they battle.

If a fire were to break out in Old Town or Kam Lake this evening, no one could say with reasonable certainty that firefighters would have the consistent supply of water they would need to most effectively battle the fire.

Adding more firefighters to the mix won't fix that.


An important way to look at conservation
Deh Cho Drum - Thursday, November 10, 2016

For many people in the Deh Cho, conservation is a way of life.

It is no secret that indigenous people have often led the way when it comes to preservation of land, water and life. As hunters, trappers and fishers, people in the Deh Cho are often stewards of the region.

It comes as no surprise to anyone one living here that the social benefits of that stewardship far outstrip the costs involved.

Now, a new report commissioned by Tides Canada and the Indigenous Leadership Initiative seeks to quantify exactly what those benefits might be. The report was compiled by Social Ventures Australia.

The figure researchers came up with is $2.50 in social return for every $1 invested - and that is just the beginning. To put it in the terms used in the report, an investment of $4.5 million has seen a return of $11.1 million in just seven years within the Deh Cho region and Lutsel K'e Dene First Nation.

That figure alone should be motivation enough for anyone wondering whether the money has been worth it. Few other investments can grow that quickly or have such a noticeable impact.

And as more money is invested, as programs grow and more people become guardians of the land and water, that number is sure to increase.

But to paraphrase Dehcho First Nations Grand Chief Herb Norwegian, there's a hidden return on investment that can't be quantified.

That's where the "moral" impact of stewardship comes in.

Morality, in this context, can be as simple as cleaning up after oneself, hunting responsibly and taking your garbage with you when you move campsites.

It applies to anyone and everyone who spends time out on the land, whether for recreational purposes or for work.

The benefits of this particular impact may be the trickiest of all, if impossible, to quantify simply because the long-term effects of this kind of stewardship reach 20, 50, even 100 years or more in the future.

We may not even see all of those effects in our lifetime.

But if such programs were not in place, the effects would be noticeable quickly.

The numbers themselves don't matter all that much.

Most people don't need to be told that investing in stewardship will have positive results - that's fairly obvious.

What does matter is the examples of social and economic outcomes listed in the report: less crime, increased capacity for self-determination and cultural retention of the many benefits listed.

In effect, what the report supports is the idea that a healthy land helps us to become healthy people.

And when we take care of the land, we ultimately take care of ourselves.

And that goes beyond quantifying. You can't put a price on mental and physical health.


Thank you for my freedom
Inuvik Drum - Thursday, November 10, 2016

Remembrance Day was always a big show and assembly at school, but growing up, I don't think I nor my peer group had a true sense of what the day really meant.

We heard the stories, listened to the poems and watched the somber displays, but that's a hard message to get through to youth who, like me, grew up in Canada's supreme peace.

I knew about 9/11 and Afghanistan when I was a teenager. I had service medals from my late grandfather in my bedroom. My grandmother told stories of living on rations in England during the 1940s. But the prospect of war in my own life still wasn't real.

Plus, there is something of a Western guilt, where we feel ashamed for any violence our past generations were involved in. At least that's the case among the generation I grew up with. I don't think I am stretching the truth to say a large number of us had an overall negative view of anything associated with war.

I gained my respect for wartime sacrifice after taking an interest in political history, economics and totalitarian regimes.

Freedom is the most important thing in my life. There is nothing I cherish more than being free to be who I am, to do what I want and to pursue what interests me.

Not everyone grows up in freedom. Even today, totalitarian regimes in North Korea and Venezuela dominate citizens' lives, controlling how they can spend their time and money. Every step toward that is a step I don't want to take.

If not for Canadians who were brave enough to risk their lives for our freedom, we could very well be living under national socialism, communism, some version of Stalinism.

It is important to remember and commemorate lives lost in defense of our freedom, but it is just as important we remember why men and women fought and died and what they continue to be willing to die for.

Freedom is the path to happiness and human achievement. That crosses the spectrum, from the freedom to walk to the store, the freedom to set up a business, the freedom to spend your own money as you choose, the freedom to love whom you desire.

In short, it is the freedom to live as you wish. 

I'll take freedom over the prison state of totalitarianism every day, and thank God other Canadians thought so too.

E-mailWe welcome your opinions. Click here to e-mail a letter to the editor.