CLASSIFIEDSADVERTISINGSPECIAL ISSUESONLINE SPORTSOBITUARIESNORTHERN JOBSTENDERS

NNSL Photo/Graphic

NNSL Photo/Graphic
Editorial Cartoons

Subscriber pages
buttonspacer News Desk
buttonspacer Columnists
buttonspacer Editorial
buttonspacer Readers comment
buttonspacer Tenders

Demo pages
Here's a sample of what only subscribers see

Subscribe now
Subscribe to both hardcopy or internet editions of NNSL publications

Advertising
Our print and online advertising information, including contact detail.

Home page text size buttonsbigger textsmall textText size Email this articleE-mail this page

Don't play games with the Games
Weekend Yellowknifer - Friday, July 31, 2015

The amount of unknowns shrouding the City of Yellowknife's Canada Winter Games bid is unnerving.

Capital expenditures by the territory and the federal government - as outlined in the Games funding formula - reach a ceiling at $3 million each but for the city, one can look up and see the infinite universe. All extraneous capital costs fall onto the city and, as it stands, $9 million is not going to cut it.

Aside from work that has to be undertaken to upgrade existing miscellaneous facilities, there are major capital upgrades required to host the Games, which come with a seemingly unrealistic early-estimation price tag of $35 million. It's hard to imagine how an estimated $30 million for an upgraded pool and an estimated $23 million for an athletes village factors within the confines of this figure.

The pool is already slated for replacement in the year of the Games but in order for it to become a suitable facility, completion would have to be bumped up a few years. Mayor Mark Heyck told Yellowknifer in January getting the pool up to snuff for the Games won't cost the city any more than the original plan.

The athlete's village remains the wild card.

There have been murmurings of the GNWT's intention to foot the bill to simultaneously meet the needs of seniors' housing in the city - a need that grows more dire by the day. The plan would be to build housing, use it for the athletes, then after the Games, pass it along to seniors.

In November, Jeff Renaud, chief executive officer for Avens Community for Seniors, told Yellowknifer, "We're in a crisis pretty much as far as housing options for seniors."

Weledeh MLA Bob Bromley told Yellowknifer in April the seniors population is growing by six or seven per cent per year. Renaud said, also in May, the waiting list for a permanent bed for seniors ranges from 20 to 40 people.

All the while, an Avens project aimed at alleviating the "crisis" through added beds has been stalled after the blasting stage because a private partner pulled out and the GNWT has been hesitant on committing the funds.

Is the GNWT going to commit $23 million - or more - to athletes' housing that could become seniors' housing in more than eight years but fail to back the proponent of an already planned development? Could these two needs be combined?

Will new seniors' housing stay in a holding pattern for at least eight years while waiting for the Canada Winter Games?

Unfortunately, the answers to these questions don't exist yet because whatever the GNWT intends to do, it will not commit to doing until the city commits to making the bid.

One need only recall the new water treatment plant, which put the city on the hook for $31 million after the territorial government transformed federal guidelines into regulation the city must adhere to.

These two levels of government should not rush to link arms and twirl.

The city should demand a commitment from the GNWT or not commit to the Games. The GNWT should offer a solution, if possible, but not to the detriment of the seniors population. Major scrutiny is required here.

Should preliminary investigation into the feasibility of the Games reveal they are not, in fact, feasible, both levels of government should be ready to halt the parade and go home.

Failing that, this is an election year for both levels of government.


Variety is the spice of democracy
Deh Cho Drum - Thursday, July 30, 2015
It's that wonderful time of year again, when election signs are on the verge of popping up around communities and prospective politicians anticipate the start of their campaigns.

The writ will be issued on Oct. 26 and nominations will close on Oct. 30. That is when we will know exactly who is in the running to represent us.

From there, it will only be a few short weeks until election day on Nov. 23.

The Deh Cho is not yet quite in the dog days of summer. October still feels a long way off and no one wants to think about colder weather yet. However, with July at an end, there is truly no better time to start thinking about running a campaign.

Politics is often dismissed as a dirty business. Politicians have a bad reputation - sometimes rightfully so - for not following through on their promises or trying to put a spin on any given situation.

Elections showcase the very best and absolute worst democracy has to offer.

However, while many of us complain that our representatives are not doing enough or are not properly representing our interests, few desire to take on the burden of running for public office themselves.

In the 2011 territorial election, incumbent Deh Cho MLA Michael McLeod was beaten by current MLA Michael Nadli - the only other contender for that riding. Meanwhile, in the Nahendeh riding, MLA Kevin Menicoche was challenged by Bertha Norwegian and won. Norwegian was the only candidate to run against him.

Neither the Deh Cho nor the Nahendeh are small ridings. The Deh Cho riding includes Fort Providence, Kakisa, Hay River Dene Reserve and Enterprise. The Nahendeh riding, meanwhile, includes Wrigley, Trout Lake, Fort Liard, Jean Marie River, Nahanni Butte and Fort Simpson.

This is an area of the Northwest Territories that is, as far as the North is concerned, very well populated.

To have only one or two challengers - or, as has been the case in some elections, none - for a seat in the legislature is unfortunate.

The only thing worse than sparse competition is acclamation. While some may view an acclamation as a sign an incumbent has been doing their job well, it still removes the choice of who to vote for from constituents. As well, having only one or two candidates for a riding can discourage voting.

Everyone knows it is their civic right, and arguably their duty, to vote. But to take that a step further, members of the public also have a duty to run for office. It is their ideas and fresh perspectives that lead to change, and without them the political system stagnates.

Often when elections roll around, we hear how candidates are "more of the same" or how we will be voting for "the least worst option." But if all current options are bad, then the only democratic thing to do is throw your name in the hat and provide a better alternative.

Previous elections have seen far more challengers than 2011 did. It would be nice to see a return to those times.


Children are the future
Inuvik Drum - Thursday, July 30, 2015

When former first lady Hillary Clinton published the book It Takes a Village back in 1996, it sparked a debate over who, in fact, raises a child. The book's title was attributed to a supposed African saying, "It takes a village to raise a child."

After the release of Clinton's book, the Republican Party presidential candidate Bob Dole said: "... it does not take a village to raise a child. It takes a family to raise a child."

Although the exact definition of what a 'family' is can be parsed, the notion that a child is best raised solely within the nuclear family is new.

We entrust our schools to educate, protect and socialize children. But are they really properly suited to create a full human being? It can be argued that the one thing that cannot be taught in school - the one thing that until recently, was not seriously considered an important tool for humans to have - is empathy.

Unlike sympathy, which requires a person to have experienced the feeling another person is going through before it can be triggered, empathy is a whole other level of consciousness. Empathy requires a person to be able to, in effect, have an out-of-body type of association with another person. Having empathy requires being able to put oneself into another person's shoes and understand what they are feeling without having first-hand knowledge of the experience.

Anthropologist Gwen Dewar argues that a child's ability to perceive empathy is blunted by seeing expressions of violence, a kind of desensitization.

The question becomes not if children can be raised within the modern concept of family, but if they can be raised in a standardized, theorized, and in some cases sanitized, system.

Dewar argues that the top requirements for a child to learn empathy are - among other things - ensuring the child's emotional needs are met, that they see themselves as individuals with unique emotions, and that they can see what they have in common with others.

Schools and teachers, no matter how caring and supportive they are with their wards, are not specifically mandated to meet these requirements. In fact, it can be argued that through intense competition, a child's sense of empathy is dulled.

There are many influences in society. Children are bombarded with information, images, opinions in social and mainstream media. Children get the truest understanding of what is expected of them as human beings through example.

They are getting the government's version of what is expected of them. They are getting the media's version of what is expected of them. Who is giving them the village's version of what is expected of them?


Fair Elections Act anything but
Yellowknifer - Wednesday, July 29, 2015

If a federal politicians were trying to think of a way to disenfranchise Northern voters under the auspices of fairness, it wouldn't look too different from the Fair Elections Act.

The legislation was enacted to eliminate voter fraud, something that has not been substantiated in any meaningful way. What we are more likely to hear about post-election are many instances of people who had no previous problems voting being denied at the polling booth.

The new rules tighten ID requirements and all but do away with the practice of vouching. The practice once allowed registered voters to vouch for people who couldn't prove their address. That's still the case in territorial elections.

But with federal elections, a voucher may only vouch for a single voter, and only if the person being vouched for has two pieces of paper with his or her name on it such as a credit card or an employee card - items many in Yellowknife's homeless community would certainly be without, and difficult items to put together in many other households.

Weledeh MLA Bob Bromley says as many as 50 per cent of potential NWT voters in some smaller communities are without two pieces of ID. It is easier to obtain photo ID in larger centre such as Yellowknife but it remains a struggle for smaller communities that lack specialized camera equipment needed to take the photos. There are 12 driver and vehicle licensing offices in the territory where photo ID can be procured but more than 30 communities. Not to mention the fact that territorial health cards have no photos accompanying them as several other jurisdictions do. This so-called "fair" elections act will discourage many voters in Yellowknife, Ndilo and Dettah and many other smaller communities come next election.

Readers can be forgiven if they suspect the Conservative government enacted this legislation with an aim to eliminate voters from remote communities and with low incomes who don't typically vote Conservative.


Union of Southern Workers?
Yellowknifer - Wednesday, July 29, 2015

If you work at Dominion Diamonds' Ekati mine, the company will make sure you can get to work -- on their own dime -- from 11 communities within the NWT and Nunavut, including Yellowknife.

Until recently, Dominion would also fly you from Edmonton to Yellowknife to make your shift. As of June 1, those Edmonton flights were discontinued as part of the company's commitment to encourage Northern residency among its employees.

This may not be best for Dominion's bottom line - southern workers are easier to find and are likely better trained - but the company's move to eliminate the flights certainly puts the union representing its workers in a sticky situation.

Dominion has filed a "failure to bargain" complaint against the Union of Northern Workers (UNW) with the Canada Industrial Relations Board, citing the union's reluctance to state its position on the cancelled flights.

Northern worker residency is important. People who live and work in the North pay taxes in the North and support our Northern economy. It wouldn't look good for the UNW to be pushing for free flights for southern-based workers while the territorial government - its employees also represented by the UNW - is desperately trying to persuade people to move here.

After all, it's this much larger group of workers who have paid the lion's share of the cost -- through their union dues -- for the UNW's new multi-million dollar headquarters being built downtown.

The vast majority of the union's membership base live and work in the North and clearly benefit from a strong Northern economy.

The UNW should be encouraged by Dominion Diamond's decision to make good on its commitment to the North, not fight behind closed doors and through parsed policy statements to protect the interests of workers who might love the money they make here but don't love the North enough to live here.


Review board made right call for Kiggavik
Editorial Comment by Michele LeTourneau
Kivalliq News - Wednesday, July 29, 2015

The Nunavut Impact Review Board (NIRB) - in the time leading up to the public hearing and during the hearing itself in March in Baker Lake - clearly listened to interveners on the proposed Kiggavik uranium project. A mine that has no project start date in should not receive a project certificate.

The company admitted a start date could be as far away as 20 years.

That's how NIRB called it. That's the decision it submitted to Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Minister Bernard Valcourt. "The Kiggavik Project as presented has no definite start date or development schedule. The board found that this adversely affected the weight and confidence which it could give to assessments of future ecosystemic and socio-economic effects," stated Elizabeth Copland, the board's chairperson.

I think it's fair to say that anyone alive today with 20 years to look back on can conclude it's not possible to know what will be happening in the world in 10 years, never mind in 20 years.

Nuclear energy is not enjoying its moment in the sun. In fact, French parent company Areva is experiencing all sorts of woes. The company has a lot at stake.

Because of that, perhaps it can be forgiven for heading straight to Valcourt with its plea that he reject the board's decision. But I think not. The fact is, as Baker Lake Hunters and Trappers Organization chairperson Richard Aksawnee notes in his own letter to Valcourt, the impact review board is a child of the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement.

This will become a trend, of course. As Nunavut Inuit demonstrate that they are absolutely capable of making yes or no decisions on development in their territory, and make occasional no decisions on perfectly valid grounds, industry is going to push back and play dirty.

In its letter to Valcourt, Areva gave examples of projects they've had approved without project start dates. But they did not present this information prior to the public hearing or at the hearing, despite being in full possession of the knowledge that this was the main sticking point for interveners. As Aksawnee rightly points out, with the hearing process concluded, interveners cannot even respond to this new information

Fair play? Good faith? I think not.

But the most egregious issue here is one of principle: the blatant attempt to circumvent made-in-Nunavut decisions. Baffinland is attempting the same thing. In that case, the company is saying it doesn't like the Nunavut Planning Commission's decision on Mary River, so it asked Valcourt to send it to the review board instead.

What's at issue there? Ice breaking activity to ship ore 10 months of the year. I cannot even imagine the repercussions for the ecosystem.

In an interview with Premier Peter Taptuna last December, I clearly heard him say to me that he trusts the Nunavut regulatory system. He said he trusts the Nunavut Planning Commission, the Nunavut Impact Review Board, the Nunavut Water Board and the Nunavut Wildlife Management Board. So let's see some of that trust.

As Aksawnee has said, "We're not against the proposed Kiggavik mine, we just want to make sure our land and wildlife (are) protected for our hunters." That sounds balanced to me.

I recently learned the Inuktitut word for uranium: nunguijuituq. I'm told this means "it never goes away, it never dies." Uranium mining is not like other mining.

There's no way a decision of such great import should be made quickly for a mine that may never come to be. More importantly, if it does come to be far in the future, it's in the future the decision should be made - with all the best possible information available at that time.


A little something for everyone
Northwest Territories/News North - Monday, July 27, 2015

Last week in Yellowknife, NWT residents got their first glimpse of what a post-devolution Thaidene Nene will look like.

Carved like a pie, the territorial government has set aside pieces that are destined to become a federal national park, territorial reserve, caribou conservation area and sites for possible future mineral development. This proposal is a far cry from the original plan to set aside the entire 33,000-square-kilometre area for a national park in 1970.

According to the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society's website on the history of Thaidene Nene, the federal government first expressed interest in turning the area, which wraps around the East Arm of Great Slave Lake, into a federal reserve in 1969. At the time, Lutsel K'e Dene First Nation Chief Pierre Catholique refused to work with the feds out of fear the new designation would inhibit the rights of Lutsel K'e Dene to hunt, fish and trap in their ancestral area. But by the late 1990s members of Lutsel K'e Dene Nation were beginning to come around to the idea due to the discovery of high mineral potential in parts of the park.

The band, through its chief negotiator Steven Nitah, worked with the feds to establish Thaidene Nene national park up until devolution last spring, when the territorial government inherited custody of NWT lands.

This is when the plan got complicated. According to Environment and Natural Resources Minister Michael Miltenberger to News/North earlier this spring, Thaidene Nene was to become some sort of Frankenstein hybrid of national park, territorial reserve and possible location of future industrial development. Without a map or specific information as to how a federally-controlled national park would fit into a more lenient territorial nature reserve, all the while leaving room for potential mining activity, the idea seemed nonsensical and even a little alarming.

But after seeing a map of how these puzzle pieces are intended to fit together, Thaidene Nene seems more like the ultimate compromise. The national park component is significant in size, forming the centre of the area. The territorial components make up most of the rest of the delineated area, ensuring members of Lutsel K'e Dene Band will continue to be able to hunt, fish, trap, boat and camp in much of Thaidene Nene. The excluded areas for mineral development are relatively small, peripheral and clearly marked.

These areas are rich in uranium, rare earth minerals and diamond potential and the Northwest Territories has, for better or worse, a resource-based economy. It's prudent for the territorial government to take mineral viability into consideration before carving out mass pieces of land for eternal conservation. It's also prudent for the government to be open about possible industrial development and specific about where these excluded areas might be, which is what the GNWT is doing.

This map, which indicates the possible future of Thaidene Nene, is a good example of this government working to make sure everybody's needs are met in managing the land around the East Arm of Great Slave Lake.

From the promised conservation of ancient teepee rings near Fairchild Point to the caribou conservation area in the northern tip to the excluded portions left for development, everybody gets a piece of the pie.


Beneficiaries could run gold mine one day
Nunavut/News North - Monday, July 27, 2015

If one zooms in close to the cheque being presented to Kivalliq Inuit Association president David Ningeongan by Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. board chairperson Jim Nasso July 13 in Rankin Inlet, you can make out the typewritten words "one million five hundred thousand and zero cents."

That large chunk of money, a result of 40 months of negotiations, represents a milestone event for Inuit impact benefit agreements because of the expressed goal for the funds. The Kivalliq Inuit Association plans to put $750,000 per year into a fund to be used exclusively for training Inuit beneficiaries for employment, above and beyond the organization's other responsibilities.

The money is flowing from Agnico Eagle's Meliadine gold mine, which is set to begin construction next year 30 km northwest of Rankin Inlet. It's a massive undertaking, expected to employ 1,100 people during the multi-year construction period, then expected to employ about 850 people when operating as a combination open-pit and underground gold mine.

The KIA will receive annual production payments once mining actively begins, structured so 75 per cent is held back during the first five years of production and paid out in years six and seven. The potential for millions of dollars in benefits for the Inuit of the Kivalliq region is enormous. More importantly is the potential for Inuit beneficiaries to play a long-term meaningful role in the operation of the mine.

Nasso and chief executive officer Sean Boyd spoke in Rankin Inlet about Agnico Eagle's operations in Mexico. Three gold mines, employing about 2,200 people, are 100 per cent staffed by Mexicans and Nasso would like to see "Inuit run (the Meliadine) mine like the Mexicans do."

Considering the training commitments, that is possible.

The immediate goal is for there to be 50 per cent employment of Inuit beneficiaries at Meliadine, achievable considering the current level of 30 to 34 per cent employment of beneficiaries at Agnico Eagle's Meadowbank open-pit mine north of Baker Lake, which has been operating since 2010.

The KIA was careful in negotiating this benefit agreement to realize maximum advantage, involving board members from the communities and ensuring that the final deal is open and transparent. Once it is approved by the federal minister, the agreement will be publicly accessible.

The work begins now. Beneficiaries in the communities will be consulted about tailoring training programs to their needs. Strategic plans will be developed to reach employment goals.

The end result is good news -- money from the benefit agreement will be used in the best possible manner and there will be high-paying jobs for hundreds of land claim agreement beneficiaries, who will be given the opportunity to advance in their positions.

E-mailWe welcome your opinions. Click here to e-mail a letter to the editor.