Yellowknife Inn



 Features

 Front Page
 News Desk
 News Briefs
 News Summaries
 Columnists
 Sports
 Editorial
 Arctic arts
 Readers comment
 Find a job
 Tenders
 Classifieds
 Subscriptions
 Market reports
 Handy Links
 Best of Bush
 Visitors guides
 Obituaries
 Feature Issues
 Advertising
 Contacts
 Today's weather
 Leave a message


SSISearch NNSL
 www.SSIMIcro.com

NNSL on CD

. NNSL Logo
SSIMicro

<A HREF="https://archive.nnsl.com/ads/ACHF11327-YellowKniferGIC.swf">[View using Helper Application]</a>

Home page text size buttonsbigger textsmall textText size Email this articleE-mail this page

Green light for public Roland inquiry
Yellowknife MLAs flip-flop on privacy request

Mike W. Bryant
Northern News Services
Published Friday, August 21, 2009

SOMBA K'E/YELLOWKNIFE - The conflict of interest inquiry into Premier Floyd Roland's affair with a legislative assembly clerk will likely be held in public now that two regular MLAs - both complainants - have dropped their request for a closed door proceeding.

Glenn Tait, legal counsel for sole adjudicator Ted Hughes, forwarded a letter to Yellowknifer Wednesday, advising that Kam Lake MLA Dave Ramsay and Frame Lake MLA Wendy Bisaro have withdrawn their request for a private inquiry. That effectively cancels the need for a hearing Sept. 7 for media to make arguments on whether the inquiry should be open or closed.

Tait couldn't be reached for comment but in his Aug. 12 letter he writes he will be advising Hughes to immediately hear evidence for the inquiry on the Sept. 7 date.

Ramsay, with the backing of Bisaro, made a plea for privacy during a preliminary hearing held July 16. The MLA, one of Roland's most vocal critics, argued a public inquiry would be overly sensational, and would upset the premier's family.

"It could turn into quite a soap opera, and I don't know what anyone would gain from that," Ramsay said at the hearing.

Ramsay couldn't be reached for comment this week, but Bisaro said they dropped their request after realizing Roland's lawyer didn't object to a public inquiry.

"At the hearing, after Dave had made his statement and I said, 'yes I give my support,' Roland's counsel said, 'well, we were going to go forward with a public inquiry, and go in-camera later.'

"I said, 'whoa, oh my.' I was really surprised, but then there was no way to pull (the privacy request) back because Dave and I hadn't discussed it."

Bisaro said other information had also come to light to influence their idea that a closed inquiry is no longer necessary, although she wouldn't say what it is yet.

The MLA said though she has previously called on Roland to resign, she now feels it would be better he stay on as premier and finish his term, although she would vote against him if Hughes recommends MLAs terminate him following the inquiry.

"At this point, for us to actively pursue his dismissal, it's not the time to do it," said Bisaro. "We've got work that needs to be done."

Six MLAs, Bisaro, Ramsay, Bob Bromley, Glen Abernethy, David Krutko, and Jane Groenewegen, filed a complaint with conflict of interest commissioner Gerald Gerrand after the affair was revealed last December. They accuse the premier's girlfriend, Patricia Russell, of passing along secrets aired during committee meetings closed to cabinet ministers, where Russell was the clerk.

Gerrand subsequently appointed Hughes to lead the inquiry.

Abernethy said he doesn't care one way or another whether the inquiry is held publicly or in private because he is confident the information disclosed during the proceedings will eventually be made public.

"I don't care," said Abernethy. "What I understood, regardless of whether interviews are held behind closed doors or not, ultimately, I was under the impression that everything will go public."

In any event, he still wants Roland to resign.

"I'm not out to get Floyd," said Abernethy. "I believe there was a conflict."