Righting wrongs in Russia
Moscow delegation looks to Inuvik for aboriginal help by Ian Elliot
INUVIK (Feb 13/98) - If you think Canada's North has a knotty political problem, take a look at Russia with
five provinces and territories and 100,000 people scattered north of 60.
That country is trying to come to grips with a North that has 27
semi-autonomous provinces, more than 30 distinct cultures and language
groupings, 11 million people, a sputtering new free-market economy and an
even more ghastly legacy of forced relocation, residential schools and
suppression of native culture than existed here.
That's why a group of Russians have been here for the last two
weeks trying to learn what we are doing.
"During the process of democratic reforms in Russia, the aboriginal
peoples became very active and started raising the problems that concern
them to the federal and regional governments," explained Stanislav
Dorjinkevitch, the deputy chief of the Russian equivalent of the department
of Indian and Northern Affairs, through a translator.
He led a group of four Russian government and aboriginal
representatives who met with native and government officials in Inuvik last
week during a two-week tour of Canada; another five were visiting Rankin
Inlet.
"Canada has the most experience with negotiations with aboriginal
people and those negotiations were aimed at improving the economic
situation of aboriginal people."
Just as in Canada, land claims are going to be occupying the
Russian government after president Boris Yeltsin signed an order
recognizing native ownership of traditional land. But for a country making
a difficult transition from a centralized economy, a political system still
in chaos and little money to distribute to aboriginal groups to improve
their situation, the Russians feel they could use a little guidance.
After meeting with both Gwich'in and Inuvialuit leaders among
others, the Russians were able to formulate what they would like to see
happen in Russia, and as Dorjinkevitch put it, does not sound so different
than what is evolving here.
"What I have learned is, if the interests of aboriginals are voiced
through any intermediaries, it is not a true reflection of their opinions.
They should be in charge of the changes they are going to implement."
The main difference between the two Norths is the amount of
development, he said. Russia, with a state economy, had much more power to
develop the natural resources of its North through bonuses for workers and
although none of the Russians mentioned it, prison labor and forced exile
of political undesirables to Siberia started in the 1920s.
Accompanying that were the sort of aboriginal policies that made
Canada's look almost humane by comparison, but they were done by the former
leadership in the name of efficiency, the Russians said.
"These policies were not meant to be harmful, but they were all
done from the standpoint of the white man," said Dorjinkevitch, who spoke
the language of the modern bureaucrat fluently.
"Concerning relocation, it was seen as next to impossible to build
structures like hospitals and schools in settlements that had only 100
residents. Residential schools were created because it was difficult to
educate people who were by nature nomadic. I do not think these policies
were meant to harm the people, they were done with the best intentions, but
as a result they led to problems like children being taken from their
parents at an early age, drinking was a problem, there were health problems
when people were introduced to new diseases."
"The same problems happened here. I'm sure we have a lot to learn
from Canadians, but at the same time, I hope Canadians will learn from our
experience also." |