However, First Air is now effectively in a position of running a monopoly in much of the North. Without any serious competition, there are no checks and balances on price and the delivery of services.

The theory behind open and free markets is that competition for business keeps the prices down and increases the service. Ultimately, the customer benefits. At least that's the theory.

On the other hand, in a free market the financially strong tend to devour the weak. This leaves the consumer at the mercy of the company.

In the North, air travel is an essential service. Many of the amenities that make modern life in the North possible are available only by air.

Because of airline deregulation, which was intended to open the skies to free-market competition and ensure a levelling of prices, the consumer has no protection from monopoly pricing.

With First Air assuming most of the routes for passenger and freight delivery, consumers will be suspicious of fare increases and changes in service. Even if those changes are justified, First Air should be prepared for criticism.

While nobody wishes First Air anything but the best in continuing to serve the North, customers would be better served in an marketplace where there is competition for their business.

The problem, once again, is that the rules, in this case airline deregulation, were made for busy southern markets. The unique character of doing business in the North makes for circumstances where the southern-made rules don't work.

Government regulation of the airline business may not be the answer, but somebody has to be looking out for the needs of the Northern customer when it comes to this essential service.

It is encouraging to hear the new Indian and Northern affairs minister say she's committed to implementing the recommendations of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples.