Yellowknife Inn


NNSL Photo/Graphic

business pages

Subscriber pages
buttonspacer News Desk
buttonspacer Columnists
buttonspacer Editorial
buttonspacer Readers comment
buttonspacer Tenders

Demo pages
Here's a sample of what only subscribers see

Subscribe now
Subscribe to both hardcopy or internet editions of NNSL publications
.
SSIMicro
Home page text size buttonsbigger textsmall textText size Email this articleE-mail this page

Feds deny risk of Arctic oil spill

Emily Ridlington
Northern News Services
Published Monday, May 10, 2010

NUNAVUT - The federal government does not have a contingency plan in place for an oil spill in the Arctic, warns Yukon Liberal MP Larry Bagnell. This leaves local government officials and federal government critics wondering what would happen and how a spill would affect the environment and the fishing industry.

Tories need to check a map

From: Hansard, May 5, 2010

Hon. Larry Bagnell (Yukon, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, with the world's attention focused on the oil spill off Louisiana, Canadians are alarmed to hear that oil companies are planning to drill in the Arctic waters. This summer drilling is set to begin off Davis Strait, adjacent to Canadian waters. It is an area known for its high concentration of icebergs. An oil spill from a ship or rig in the ice causes its own unique set of problems with which the Conservative government has not dealt.

Will the minister commit to table, before the House rises for the summer, its plan to deal with an unfortunate but potentially disastrous oil spill in the Arctic from a ship or drilling rig?

Mr. David Anderson (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Natural Resources and for the Canadian Wheat Board, CPC): Mr. Speaker, the member knows he is performing mischief here, because he knows full well there are no current authorizations to drill in the Beaufort Sea, so I am not sure what he is talking about...

Bagnell: Mr. Speaker, that shows that the parliamentary secretary knows absolutely nothing about what he is talking about, because the drilling is in the Davis Strait, right beside Greenland near Canadian waters. Time and time again the Liberals have asked the government to invest in technology to clean up oil spills under ice. The government has refused to do it. We are still putting out licences. Perhaps a parliamentary secretary who actually knows what is going on could stand up and answer the question about how the government is going to protect pristine Arctic waters.

Anderson: Mr. Speaker, apparently the member opposite does not even know where the border is between Canada and Greenland. No one has made the north more of a priority than the Prime Minister. No one has protected the north more than the Prime Minister. This environment is pristine, beautiful and isolated and we will protect it.

"Right now what we and other communities would be doing would be relying on the Coast Guard or the military for help," said Duncan Walker, senior administrative officer in Resolute.

On April 20, there was an explosion and fire aboard an oil drilling rig in the Gulf of Mexico, and an undersea well is now leaking 210,000 gallons of oil a day. The spill is drifting towards the U.S. coastline and may affect the shorelines of Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi and Florida.

Drilling for oil in the Davis Strait off the western coast of Greenland will start this summer by U.K. company Cairn Energy, and Walker said a contingency plan is needed in the event of accident and spill that would affect Nunavut.

He and other officials in the region are waiting for mock oil spill training that will take place in Resolute this summer as part of the military's Operation Nanook. He said he hopes it will provide the community with more of an idea of what would happen if there were an oil spill.

In Ottawa during Question Period in the House of Commons on May 5, Bagnell asked the Conservative government if there is a contingency plan being developed in case there is a potential oil spill in the Arctic from a ship or drilling rig. Bagnell, the Liberal's critic for Arctic Issues and Northern Development, said he has raised the issue in committee for more than a year.

An answer to his question was again refused.

"I think the Louisiana spill has shocked everyone, including them (the Conservative government)," said Bagnell.

While the government may have been shocked, Bagnell said he got the impression from the government's response in the House that they do not seem too concerned about oil drilling in Greenland.

A spill caused by exploration and drilling in the Davis Strait would have a direct impact on the fishing industry in communities such Clyde River, Qikiqtarjuaq and Pond Inlet. Depending on the current, waters tarnished with oil could reach other communities including Resolute.

"Anything such as an oil spill would have an impact on seal, walrus, polar bears and the fish that they eat," said Walker.

He said depending on the scale of the spill, it could also affect the fishery.

Bagnell said the Conservatives seemed to argue an oil spill of such magnitude - referring to the spill in the Gulf of Mexico - could not happen in Canada because the standards are more strict. He said he believes this is not true. Equipment was on site to shut off the pipeline in the Gulf and it failed. In an ideal world, Bagnell said the spill should not have occurred. The same can be said for the Exxon Valdez spill in the late 1980s in Alaska when the tanker drifted aground and millions of litres of crude oil flowed into Prince William Sound.

"No matter how many precautions they (the companies) take, these things are not planned and it could happen under any circumstance," said Bagnell.

Walker said the hamlet does have oil spills kits in case of an emergency, but by no means does his community have boats such as those being seen on television assisting in handling the spill in the United States.

The government has "never really had to face this before and as time goes along they will have to take a more serious look at it," said Walker.

We welcome your opinions on this story. Click to e-mail a letter to the editor.