---

Taxi licence freeze won't help
Yellowknifer - Friday, July 3, 2009

---

Is Tourism and Parks the worst-run division in the worst-run department within the territorial government?

Sadly, it's a question we find ourselves asking after witnessing one boondoggle after another over the last two years: the scrapped plans for an RV park on Long Lake, the legions of angry full-season campers, the faulty online reservation system and the empty extended-stay campsites.

It's no wonder park officials were left sitting on their hands this summer after forgetting to apply for a land-use permit - for construction last fall, by the way - to clear brush for more campsites at Reid Lake Territorial Park. Bad judgment and missed opportunities seems to follow this department like a black cloud.

Case in point is the dismal participation in this year's ballot draw for extended-stay campsites at Prelude and Reid Lake. Only 30 people bothered to attend this year for 80 available sites after parks officials slashed the number of weeks available from 16 to eight - which also meant participants had to choose from a block period that either started in the frosty month of May or ended in likewise oft-chilly September - while sticking with the same $500 price tag for half the time campers used to get.

The plan was to free up more extended campsites so fewer people would miss out during the ballot draw. There were 40 full-season campsites under the old system.

No doubt extended-stay campers at Prelude and Reid were and still are getting a deal. Even at the increased rate of $500 for two months, other parks in Canada that offer extended stay or full-season campsites typically charge much more. Newfoundland parks demand $565 for just one month of camping.

But the bedside manner practised by Tourism and Parks has been so bad many in the Yellowknife camping community have lost hope that their concerns will ever be taken seriously.

After a disastrous attempt to implement the fee hikes and rule changes at the start of the camping season last year, park officials conducted a park usage survey, but as some local campers complained, the survey included out-of-territory visitors who were not as supportive of extended-stay campsites and don't use them.

The department then pushed through the largely unrevised changes this year while tempers still flared.

Tourism and camp space for tourists is vital if the NWT wishes to diversify its economy, but when 120 angry local residents showed up for a meeting last year to complain about the sweeping changes set to unfold, pushing ahead despite their complaints shouldn't have been the response.

A gradual increase to the fees would have made more sense, plus more options for extended stay camping. Rather than going from 40 full-season campsites to 80 two-month stays at the shoulder ends of the season, why not continue to offer some full-season sites with some two-months sites and one-month blocks, as well? Such options exist elsewhere in Canada.

Tourism and Parks has some damage control to do over the next year if it wishes to win back the trust lost among Yellowknife's camping community. Naturally, it should start with the minister in charge of Industry, Tourism and Investment, Bob McLeod. Governments sometimes have to make tough decisions, but that doesn't excuse them for making bad ones.

---

A sign of strength
Editorial Comment
Roxanna Thompson
Deh Cho Drum - Thursday, July 2, 2009

---

After four long days of meetings the Dehcho First Nations (DFN) concluded its 17th annual assembly last week. The assembly was a success and it points to the fact the DFN is on a stable track. Positive signs were visible in a number of areas.

While the assembly still had a few heated moments there was little sign of the friction between various parties that has been seen in previous assemblies. All of the delegations took their places around the arbor and stayed there until the meeting was over. During the proceedings they treated each other respectfully while trading comments and turns on the microphones.

Quorum, which has been a problem in the last few assemblies, was maintained with only a few reminders from the co-chairs.

The attendance level suggests the delegates were interested in the topics being discussed and had at least the basic knowledge of each needed to follow the conversation.

Along with the attendance, the diversity between the delegates is an encouraging sign for the organization. Dehcho First Nations' leaders continually speak about the importance of elders' knowledge, but also about making every plan with the next generation in mind.

Both elders and younger delegates were a visible and vocal presence at the meeting. A number of elders shared their knowledge and concerns during the meeting. Younger delegates were also not afraid to step forward and voice their opinions.

The speeches by a number of young delegates were met by strong applause from around the arbor. Another visible sign of the youth's interest in Dehcho First Nations' future was Lawrence Nayally of Wrigley who sat beside Minnie Letcher as the co-chair for the assembly.

During the assembly there was also a sense that the delegates had taken newly-elected Grand Chief Samuel Gargan's words to heart. Gargan spoke about the need for the Dehcho First Nations to act like what it rightfully is, a level of government.

All of this praise, however, doesn't mean that Dehcho First Nations will have a year of clear sailing until the next assembly.

Based on their comments during the assembly the new leadership in two of the largest communities, Fort Providence and Fort Simpson, clearly both need to be consulted with on some of the larger ticket issues including the Dehcho Land Use Plan and the Dehcho Process.

These two groups showed that they are both willing to challenge the current order and press for appropriate progress. Across the Dehcho chiefs and presidents are eager to see the Dehcho First Nations move forward in their negotiations.

The Dehcho First Nations emerged from the annual assembly with a new grand chief and a strong and united path. The challenge now will be to continue the momentum and keep all the communities united in the common goal.

---

Getting the shaft
Editorial Comment
Andrew Rankin
Inuvik Drum - Thursday, July 2, 2009

---

I've always had a soft spot for animals. In fact, in a lot of cases I prefer the company of dogs to people. So when I saw some of the pictures Linda Eccles took at the pound last month of animals surrounded in their own feces, I must admit it bothered me.

I'm not prepared to make a judgment call on whether what I saw was abuse.

But let's call a spade a spade. Someone wasn't doing their job. The pictures tell the story. I'm willing to take the mayor on his word when he says the town usually keeps the pound in fairly good order and it will keep a closer eye on the dwelling from now on. After all, he's a dog owner himself.

That's all well and good, for now.

But in the meantime something should be done about the seemingly unnaturally high number of stray dogs that roam around the town virtually every day. In the last month, especially, I've heard many people in town complaining about them. In fact I nearly ran over a stray dog recently.

Maybe one solution could be to develop a partially-subsidized shot program where animals can be spayed or neutered for a discounted price in proportion to what the person can pay. Sure, if the town were to fund a program like this, the up-front costs might be a bit steep, but I'm assuming that would cut down on the number of dogs at the pound and therefore cut down not only on the costs associated with housing and feeding the animals, but also the expense of shipping them to Calgary where the Calgary Humane Society attempts to find new homes for the animals. Currently Canadian North allows one animal to be shipped out free of charge per month. After that there's a charge of $200 per head. There also has to be a meaningful way to penalize dog owners who aren't properly caring for their pets.

At the moment I don't see any real measure to dissuade people from going out and getting a puppy and when it gets older and harder to maintain let it go free. That appears to be what's happening in many cases here in town.

I'm not a bleeding heart but I do believe animals deserve adequate housing. For the time being, if there's opportunity to provide them with a another home through the Calgary Humane Society, then that should be done, even if it costs $200 per head for transportation.

But it depends where town residents want to spend their money. At the end of the of the day the pound is a publicly run facility and your tax dollars are used to operate it.

Perhaps more people should take a visit down to the pound to check it out for themselves. Sure it's not a very nice place to visit. But you'll probably notice that the animals there aren't having much fun either.

---

Shine light on premier's affair
Yellowknifer - Wednesday, July 1, 2009

---

That a closed-door inquiry into Premier Floyd Roland's affair with a legislative assembly clerk is even being considered is unacceptable.

Ted Hughes, the sole adjudicator picked by conflict of interest commissioner Gerard Gerrand to conduct a preliminary hearing into the affair, will decide whether the inquiry should be public or private following the hearing July 16.

At issue is whether Patricia Russell, the former legislative assembly clerk who sat in on private meetings with regular MLAs, passed on sensitive information to the premier while still in the job and while their relationship remained a secret during the summer and fall of last year.

Roland understandably would rather the inquiry be held behind closed doors. A public inquiry with witness testimony and cross-examination by lawyers, all under the glare of the media spotlight, would exponentially increase the potential for embarrassment in an already cringe-worthy debacle.

But aside from the sordid details likely to emerge from a public inquiry, the central question remains to be answered: Did the premier take advantage of his relationship with Russell for his own political benefit?

To have done so would have been a violation of the trust given to him when MLAs made him premier in October 2007. Some MLAs have complained that Roland boasted he knew "everything that's said in that room" where the MLAs met in the presence of the premier's mistress to vent about cabinet and devise opposition strategy.

Roland insists there was no pillow talk between him and Russell about the goings-on inside regular MLA meetings, but the air has not been cleared yet.

Only a full and public inquiry can accomplish that. To close the door now would only darken the shadows on an already murky and scandalous episode.

---

Nominee program essential for new citizens
Wednesday, July 1, 2009

---

Attracting employees to the North has never been easy, yet Yellowknife needs a stable, reliable workforce in order to prosper.

This is not easy to establish in view of our high cost of living. The current recession certainly doesn't help matters.

The territory must do everything it can to attract employees - particularly immigrants, who have the most to gain from taking on work here.

Many newcomers to Canada arrive in search of better opportunities in a prosperous, stable country, as well as a more secure future for their children.

They are ready to take on jobs that will fill existing shortages in Yellowknife.

The GNWT's recently-announced immigrant employment nominee program was a long time in coming. It is astonishing that the territory is just about the last jurisdiction in Canada (just ahead of Nunavut) to implement a program that helps see to it that labour shortages are filled -- particularly since it is the only jurisdiction to see its population decline in recent years.

Starting this month, the program will allow employers to nominate employees who are on work visas for residency within a much shorter time frame - approximately a year and a half instead of several years.

This gives employers a chance to retain some of their best workers, and it adds some incentive for immigrants to come to our city.

---

Lost in translation
Editorial Comment
Kassina Ryder
Kivalliq News - Wednesday, July 1, 2009

---

The Nunavut Language Act is now official and businesses and organizations in the territory are going to have to improve services to make sure Inuktitut and Inuinnaqtun, along with French and English, are represented.

The intention is undeniably good; the question now is how exactly will it be implemented and what will the exemptions be?

Louis Tapardjuk, minister of Culture, Language, Elders and Youth, has stated publicly that incorporating the act will take time.

He pointed out that there are not yet any Inuktitut-speaking judges or doctors, although he expressed optimism that the future promises to bring such professionals.

I've often thought that living in Nunavut and ignoring Inuktitut is kind of like living in France and completely ignoring French. Learning the language of Nunavut is important and everyone should at least try.

Whenever I think about Inuktitut and my own shortcomings, my mind always wanders back to a few years ago when I used to visit with the late Kanayok Kablalik, or Little Granny as she was known to her family. She spoke little English and I spoke even less Inuktitut. Our visits always involved a certain amount of time spent staring at each other blankly and me using a crude form of sign language to try to explain myself. Luckily for me, her patience for my ignorance never wavered and she found my attempts at communication hilarious.

Once, she asked me where someone was and I said "annigit," which I thought meant "outside." Turns out I had, in fact, told her to "get out."

Even though I often said ridiculous things to an elder whom I loved very much, my efforts were always appreciated.

Another example is when she was trying to teach me to sew. I wanted to learn how to sew kamikpaks, so I went out and bought all the material we would need for the project. I went to her house to drop it off and explained, or so I thought, that I would leave the material with her and I would come back on Monday to start the job.

"Uvagu miqsiq," I said to her. "Uvanga qigi Monday." Or "You and I sew, I'll come back Monday."

To this day I don't know exactly what I said, but I returned to her house on Monday to find a beautiful pair of black kamikpaks completely sewn and ready to wear.

I panicked. I had intended to sew them with her but instead I had inadvertently created my own Little Granny sweatshop. She must have sewn all weekend to get them ready for Monday.

I thanked her profusely then called her daughter Cecelia so she could explain what I had actually meant and we all had a good laugh.

But I often wonder what happens at an elder's doctor's appointments if no family member is available to translate. Or when mining companies do presentations in communities and talk about things like "thermosyphons" and other technical concepts. How do they translate exactly? Or do they at all?

And how will the territory ensure that the needs of Inuktitut speakers will be met?

Incorporating Inuktitut into all aspects of the territory is going to take real effort and it's up to every one of us to make sure the legislation succeeds.

---

Slow and hesitant loses the race
NWT News/North - Monday, June 29, 2009

---

Americans have hit the accelerator on the development of a multi-billion dollar pipeline which has the potential to deliver 4.5 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day to the south - quadruple the volume the proposed Mackenzie Valley Pipeline can bring to market.

It's making some Northerners jittery, and for good reason.

There has been heated debate about the effect the Alaska pipeline would have on the Mackenzie Valley project.

Fueling the concern are reports that the American government is prepared to back the project with up to $40 billion in loan guarantees and the security of a regulatory process shorter than the bureaucratic swamp the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline faces.

Exxon Mobil Corp. recently announced it will work with TransCanada Corp. in hopes of building the Alaskan project. That means there's competition within Alaska to build a pipeline as oil giants BP and ConocoPhillips are also vying to build a line through the northernmost U.S. state.

All said, the Alaskan project is expected to begin production by 2018. That is compared to the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline's predicted start-up date of 2014 or 2016 -- depending on which analyst you chose - up to 12 years after talks began.

If the $16-billion Mackenzie Valley project is stalled by any further delays, a possibility exists the Alaskan project could catch up and begin production first. The scenario seems so plausible Exxon is now backing projects in both areas - it is the parent company of Imperial Oil, so it has one foot in Alaska, the other foot in the NWT.

Some analysts believe the volume of the Alaskan natural gas supply is enough to quench the southern need for natural gas, making a Mackenzie pipeline unnecessary; others say the nearly insatiable appetite for gas can only be met with the combined volumes of both pipelines.

If the latter is true, the NWT's stake in pipeline development is secured. However, even if both lines are needed it can be surmised that if Alaska goes first the NWT will see longer delays and likely won't begin construction until 2018 or later. It is hard to believe there is a sufficient supply of skilled labour and materials to work on both projects in unison.

The Canadian government has made clear it is not about to offer loan guarantees as the U.S. is doing. However, it should offer tax breaks, which it can make up for through increasing royalties once the pipeline companies pay off the bulk of their debt.

Dennis Bevington, MP for the NWT, should be demanding this sort of response. He should also be pressing the government for real action on streamlining the NWT's regulatory regime. While proper checks and balances must remain and Northerners' voices must not be drowned out, dramatic improvement is needed on the layers of red tape that exist.

The Joint Review Panel, which was formed in August 2004, is due to release its decision on the Mackenzie pipeline in December, after several very lengthy delays. From there the piles of paperwork will migrate to the National Energy Board.

All the while the race is on and the NWT can no longer afford to play the part of tortoise. The Alaskan Arctic hare is not going to take a nap while we work through the quagmire of our regulatory process.

---

'What's an inuksuk?'
Nunavut News/North - Monday, June 29, 2009

---

Baker Lake MLA Moses Aupaluktuq's observation to the legislative assembly that PETA's misuse of the 2010 Olympic logo showed "a gross misunderstanding of the seal hunt" is right on the mark.

When Nunavut News/North initially contacted People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals for comment on its version of the 2010 Olympic inuksuk, the PETA member who took our took our call was baffled.

"What's an inuksuk?" she asked.

PETA had taken the Vancouver Winter Olympic inuksuk logo, armed it with a hakapik and depicted it clubbing a seal over and over in an animation on its 2010 Olympic shame website, but knew nothing of Inuit, their lives or their culture.

Blinded by ignorance, this media-savvy animal rights Goliath with a $32 million annual budget stomps a ragged path across the lives and livelihoods of people far-removed from its Hollywood supporters.

Many people hate PETA.

Feminists and people fighting eating disorders decry its use of naked or scantily-clad female spokespersons, who occasionally urge people to become skinny like them by going vegetarian.

The group has angered human rights groups by comparing animal slaughter with the holocaust and other acts of genocide.

Other animal-loving organizations despise PETA for killing thousands of "rescued" animals instead of spending the money to care for them until they're adopted.

And many vegetarians and vegans hate PETA, blaming the organization and its bizarre campaigns for making the public think all vegetarians are crazy.

So Inuit are in good company when they shake their heads in disgust and wonder what they did to deserve this unprovoked - and apparently inadvertent - insult.

Yes, seals are cute, but so are little lambs and bunnies. And arguably, so are those are all animals Americans and Europeans eat regularly and which often live and die in much worse circumstances than a seal hunted and eaten by Inuit. But to make that PETA's major media focus would be to attack its funding base. Better to attack a culture far away it knows nothing about, then move on quickly to another victim.

Iqaluit resident Sue Idlout, has become fed up enough with PETA's tactics to start her own e-mail campaign urging Inuit to speak out.

Granted, her campaign won't be as crazy as PETA's attempt to bring the Canadian economy to its knees by boycotting maple syrup, but we hope there are more people out there who will be swayed by a voice of reason rather than a voice of ignorant fanaticism.