Features News Desk News Briefs News Summaries Columnists Sports Editorial Arctic arts Readers comment Find a job Tenders Classifieds Subscriptions Market reports Northern mining Oil & Gas Handy Links Construction (PDF) Opportunities North Best of Bush Tourism guides Obituaries Feature Issues Advertising Contacts Archives Today's weather Leave a message |
.
Supreme Court to hear killer's appeal
Carolyn Sloan Northern News Services Published Monday, December 1, 2008
Salomonie Jaw, who was convicted in 2004 of first-degree murder in the shooting death of Const. Jergen Seewald, made an application to the high court after the Nunavut Court of Appeal rejected his appeal in May. Seewald was killed in 2001 while responding to a domestic dispute between Jaw and his common-law spouse at their Cape Dorset home. While the Supreme Court has dismissed three of Jaw's grounds for appeal, it is obligated to hear a question of law raised by Justice Peter Martin, a dissenting judge in the Nunavut Court's decision. Martin maintained that trial judge John Vertes had erred when he instructed the jury that evidence of Jaw's behaviour following the shooting could be used to determine his intent when the shot was fired. "With respect, that evidence does not necessarily lead to the conclusion the appellant intended to kill the officer," he said in explaining his dissension. "Indeed, in my opinion, it does not support that conclusion at all." Given that the jury was tasked with determining whether the shooting was accidental or intentional, Martin argued there may have been a different verdict had Vertes not given such an instruction. According to Jill Copeland, executive legal officer for the Supreme Court, Jaw's hearing has been scheduled for Jan. 13, although the court will likely reserve its judgment. It could take anywhere from a few days to a year after the hearing for the judgment to be made public, she added.
|